I had known that Sotomayor was to speak at the luncheon of
the Federal Communications Bar Association (FCBA), but I thought that it would
be platitudes and of no interest. I knew that she could not answer the
difficult questions, such as how the fairness rules in Specht v. Netscape might
be updated (the case that occurred because AOL bought Netscape and made
Netscape suck by adding adware), or what she really thinks of Scalia. She could
not discuss any matter that might come before the Supreme Court in the future,
and would not even talk about role models or personal influences.
She had a lot to say and a room full of several hundred
schmoozing lawyers fell silent as soon as she reached the podium. She talked
about how people react now when she walks in the room -- even her extended
family. "I'm still Sonya," she tells her family. She said that she
used to sit in the back of the room and watch people react, but now she's often
in the front row or even the speaker.
Most of what she said was directed at the college students
who have scholarships from the FCBA, and a few of her comments were directed to
law students like me who have summer stipends thanks to the FCBA. The
students were asked to write questions and all were good questions. One student
asked how she stays connected to regular people. She said that she likes
talking to young people. So at the FCBA, she sat with the high school students.
When invited to a high school, she likes to do at least one activity with the
middle school students.
Another asked if she had any regrets about law school. She
said that she regrets not having pursued a judicial clerkship after graduating
(but she was personally recruited by Morgenthau to join the Manhattan DA's
office).
The students each received a copy of her book (I had given
my DC host a copy but did not have a copy myself). I would not usually write
about what a woman was wearing, but in the book, Sotomayor talks about
acquiring dress sense late in life. She wore a red jacket with zippers that was
simultaneously impressive and approachable. It was a brilliant choice.
Perhaps there's one legal question she could have answered:
has the Supreme Court ever considered naming sections with words? At the moment,
it uses roman numerals and capital letters. Some justice's opinions might be
clearer with section titles, but Sotomayor's do not need them.
When critics reviewed her book, they said that although her
opinions are dry and dispassionate, her book is full of warmth. It's true, and it's true about seeing her in person, too. If
you have a chance to her you speak, you must go!